You get one shot at app onboarding - most developers waste it

Readwise Summary: Follow my journey here: Website: https://adamlyttleapps.com Twitter: https://x.com/adamlyttleapps Github: https://github.com/adamlyttleapps Instagram: https://instagram.com/adamlyttleapps TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@adamlyttleapps Substack: https://adamlyttleapps.substack.com

Shout out to my amazing video production team at https://clipwing.pro/

#AppDeveloper #Solopreneur #AppGrowth

Most app developers spend months building their app and only 20 minutes on the onboarding flow. But that 20 minutes is costing them thousands of dollars every month because it turns out one in four people who download your app will only open it once and never come back. One in four gone forever. And the reason almost every time is the onboarding flow. There’s no definitive video explaining onboarding, how it works, why it works, and how to pick the right strategy for your app. So, I

decided to make one. Most onboarding flows fit into three main categories and most developers are using the wrong one. First, we have the educational flow. This is the simplest type of onboarding. It’s got one screen, it shows the user what the app does, and it gets out of their way. You can see this a lot with Apple’s own apps. It’s familiar, it’s fast, and for the right kind of an app, it is perfect. This is the onboarding I use for my own currency converter app.

It’s literally a single sheet and it’s intentionally modeled after the default iOS upgrade screen you see when you update an app. It’s pragmatic, it’s familiar, and it gets the job done. And before anyone tells me a simple onboarding won’t ever work, this app generated over $2,000 last month. So, yeah, it kind of does work. But here’s the thing, this flow has no sales messaging, no benefits, doesn’t have any sort of transformation.

If you pair this with a hard paywall and throw the user straight into the subscription prompt, it’s going to fail. The user has no idea why they should even use your app. This type of onboarding works best when paired with a soft paywall where you let the user try the app first. You let the product sell itself. Then there’s the benefit-driven flow. This is the most common onboarding flow you’ll see around right now and it’s being used extensively the last few years. The user is walked through the

benefits and features of the app in a controlled and deliberate sequence. Now, you’re not limited to text. You can add full motion graphics, animations, social proof, anything you feel like. But, here’s the mistake I see indie developers making constantly. They treat this like a feature list. Screen one, here’s feature A. Screen two, here’s feature B. Screen three, by the way, it does feature C. That’s not onboarding. That’s a spec sheet, and nobody cares.

Nobody’s going to read it. This flow performs best when you stop showing features and start showing a transformation. For that split second, for the moment that they’re in your app, you have the user’s full attention. The onboarding is the hook, and in some cases, it’s more important than the app itself. A habit tracker doesn’t just track your habits. It keeps you accountable. It makes you better every single day. So, that’s what you sell on

this onboarding flow. Identify the problem, show the transformation, remove all doubt, and you will substantially increase the number of subscriptions, especially if you follow this type of flow directly with a paywall. But, be warned. A hard paywall here can get mixed results, and Apple can even reject it. You need to give users a bit more time in your app first, which is where the third type of onboarding flow really shines. The questionnaire flow. The app

walks the user through a series of questions, like a survey, asking them how they want to use the app, what their goals are, what their problem actually is. Then, and this is the part that really matters, it calculates a personalized experience based on their answers. Hey presto, the app is built just for them. Well, kind of. These flows work best when paired with a hard paywall at the end. And here’s why I think it works so well. If a user has

already invested 5 to 7 minutes answering a bunch of questions, if they’ve seen a personalized plan calculated for them, and they think that this benefits them directly, it’s a no-brainer. They’re going to start free trial. And the data kind of backs this up. Users who opt in for a free trial via hard paywall are more likely to do so on the first session. The investment here creates a commitment. This type of onboarding works best for goal-oriented apps. Think fitness trackers, calorie

trackers, sleep trackers, that sort of thing. And I have a theory that a hard paywall here is less likely to get rejected by Apple review because the reviewer gets bored before they even make it through the entire flow. Each of these onboarding flows serves a different purpose. These are tools in our toolkit, not a sledgehammer. What works in one niche won’t automatically work in yours. The key is to stop treating onboarding as an afterthought. It’s the first screen most users will

see and maybe even the last. And the data is brutal. 90% of users churn without one. One in four never even come back after a second session. And strong onboarding drives three times more conversions and 65% higher renewals, all according to Claude.